Attempting to resolve the Republican, Libertarian and Democratic Party differences, I propose imposing a sandbox fee separate from the concept of taxes. The sandbox theory can best be described like this. Anyone who plays in the sandbox and gains from that play needs to pay a portion of their gains to the owners of the sandbox. You can also think of this as the house cut or take from winnings. The nation is a sovereign entity and we all own…
Now why would a political party not help YOU out but will help large corporations and the rich? Let us look at who they represent because they might not be representing YOU. But they are representing a constituency. Who could that be? First let us expose some financial terms. HNWI stands for “High Net Worth Individual” and one must have 1 million in net worth to meet this requirement. Ultra-HNMI are those individuals that have a net worth of 30…
This is further proof that the rich are allegedly using the Republican Party to game the system. ForeignAffairs.com: “Increasing inequality in the United States has long been attributed to unstoppable market forces. In fact, as Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson show, it is the direct result of congressional policies that have consciously — and sometimes inadvertently — skewed the playing field toward the rich.” “… the financial rewards are increasingly concentrated among a tiny elite and whose risks are borne…
The Republican Party would have you and me think that hard work and talent gains you wealth. The party is against those who gain from social programs because they do not think we deserve those rewards. But look at the partial list of success factors: • Access to first-rate education • Training opportunities • Personality type • Physical attractiveness • Height • Athletic ability • Inheritance • Nepotism • Prejudice (and not just against race or gender) • Social and…