Skip to content
McLarenblog

McLarenblog

Evaluate products and politics for you.

The Libertarian Philosoply

The Libertarian Philosoply

07/07/2011 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

When one  takes an overall top down view of Libertarian philosophy and the Libertarian Party one might immediately think that this philosophy should work best during the birth and expansion periods of this country when individual personal action, individual power, individual initiative were of paramount importance in a challenging environment of the times.  Individuals and families needed to rely on themselves more and society less for survival.  I think of farmer families spotted across this country working diligently as sole economic units and only minimally dependent upon neighbors and limited government for aid.

  • Libertarian Philosophy:
  • Maximize individual liberty
  • Freedom of expression
  • Freedom of action
  • Minimization of the state and state organizations.
  • Minimal public assistance.
  • Minimal support of the poor.

A number of factors have created themselves into our social and economic fabric through time and history and partially as a result of our tremendous economic and social success that make the Liberation philosophy inappropriate if not down right illogical today.  Let us list some of those factors and you should see how society has so vastly changed from simple to complex that the Libertarian view has not kept up with this complexity.

In our early US history, business interests needed cheap labor.  Today we move our factories over to foreign countries because there is where the cheap labor is and transportation is so efficient at bringing product back toward our county after it is created overseas.  But the first, early nation, “solution” for cheap labor was inverse to what we view as the solution for today, that is, to import the labor into this county in the form of African slaves.  This was a social problem at inception and has caused horrendous inequities among a large segment of our population.

Another historical bump in the road for Libertarians is the take over of Indian tribes, leaving a population of indigenous peoples robbed of their sovereign lands and power.
The next significant historical factor that marks the Libertarian views as obsolete is the illegal migration into this county.  We have currently over 8 to 12 million (possibly 20 to 30 million) illegal individuals from foreign countries living here.  I will not argue the right or wrong for this situation but it exists as a social problem that we must face.  This “illegals” problem really tests the Libertarian concept of public assistance.

The next significant historical evolution that marks our society as too complex for Libertarians to accept is the vast number of society members that have not risen to being complete fully functional individuals for any number of reasons.  This category alone requires a partial list of  sub-components and let me list some of those here, in no particular order or level of importance:

  • Children
  • Elderly
  • Sick
  • Infirm
  • Dementia
  • Substance abusers
  • Criminals

The reason Libertarian Party and beliefs still exists is due to the fact that the tenants of this philosophy work for the betterment of the rich and business.    The rich do not want to spend “their” money for social programs that help anyone other than themselves.  Businesses do not want controls put upon them for worker rights, environment and business practices.  Businesses and the rich do not want to be taxed, plain and simple.  Intellectually this Libertarian philosophy is flawed because it serves only those who believe in its tenants.  It fails the smell test because it is rotten for the rest of us.   For these times it is embarrassingly out of date and should be closed and put in the history books as a once upon a time theory that wrinkled like a prune with age.


Opinion, Politics
Libertarian philosophy
The Three Legged Stool.

The Three Legged Stool.

07/02/2011 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

Our economy is a very large and can be sort of understood if it is viewed as a three leg stool. Businesses spending, personal buying and government program spending are the three legs. If any one leg gets short, meaning, problematic, one or two other legs should make up the difference. This last recession saw two legs fail. Business spending and personal spending sank to such deep levels that we experienced a significant recession. To keep the economy running government spending needed to be increased. Government spending did increase to bail out very large businesses. Because the financial institutions were in deep trouble because they were at the root of the financial deficiency, they needed help right away also because they are seen by all to be the lubricant for the economic engine. Oddly, the financial institutions who gained a lot by the government stimulation plan and resulting infusion were greatly to blame for the economic collapse/problem. The tax payer instantly viewed the irony of giving aid to the very institutions that caused so many individuals to loose their jobs, homes, life savings, education plans for their children, and in total a set back if not diminish peoples futures would be hurt. To compound the insults to the American public, the financial institutions failed to adequately lubricate the economy when given large amounts of government money. The banks stood idly by not performing insufficient funding for business loans and not adequately renegotiating existing home loans down to lower more reasonable levels to make right individuals loosing their homes.

As the umbrella of irony hung over the American middle and lower class, there followed another anger toward the government, a collective reflection of what had just happened to this country. It is generally recognized that many individuals were angry for the US government bailing out the financial institutions for being greedy and the auto manufacturers for near incompetent planning (except Ford). Why should a citizen who was not responsible for a problem become an injured party and then has to pay for someone else’s errors and deficiencies? This anger helped build a platform which conservatives used to hoist themselves up high enough to promote their core political agenda. If one were to measure the Republican Party actions, we would see that job creation was not meaningful for their purposes and they even supported and worked toward eliminating middle class jobs. They supported and work hard to trimming social program work force populations including fire, police and school workers. This just does not make sense to diminish the employment of large segments of our population at the very time our unemployment rate is within five points of the great recession. We needed to rather quickly go into phase two and help the middle class and the lower class to gain employment to lubricate and run the economic engine in our communities. Moving backward by laying off middle class workers is just self serving and not best for this nation.

The vast American economy needs the huge engine comprising the middle class to spend money on product and manufacturing so the business cycle spins up again and is sustained. The Republican Party is so profoundly short sighted in at least two ways, taxes and deficit. They hear the rich pounding on them to not raise taxes. The rich have gamed the system by using the Republican Party machine to protect and enhance the rich peoples station in society. The Republican Party is the party of the rich for the rich and definitely not the middle class or lower class. The only thing that the Republican politicians can think to do is NOT allow the deficit to increase and raise taxes. They will do neither because the rich have gamed the system so completely with the Republican Party. The Republicans campaign will not raise taxes and not raise the deficit which runs counter to what is economically the best action for this country. Economists say that we needed a strong second stimulus. The rich do not stimulate the economy through their spending; the middle and lower class does this so much better. We need to get this economy going again quickly. We need stimulus to get the middle class on their feet and start spending again. The middle class needs jobs, plain and simple. Our country needs the middle class to become healthy again. We need to raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for fire, police, medical, schools, colleges so those services do not diminish and we do not exacerbate the national unemployment levels. We also need to raise taxes on the wealthy to help diminish the deficit until we get out of this hole. We can best pay off the deficit when this county is running better and generating tax revenue from solid business growth and families that have jobs and thus can pay taxes.

Two more factors need to be part of the second stimulus. These two factors come out of how and where jobs are found and created in this country. First, jobs can increase when a business increases sales to the point that management needs to hire new workers. The second job increase factor is the start up of a new business. A compound effect can even be achieved if a new business is created and then it increases its work force. We need to encourage not just job creation but business creation. The Republican Party is fixated on rich pandering and not nation building.

The Republican Party takes actions that run counter to recovery and work against what is best for the middle class and this country because they are focused on only on “their” segment of the population. The Republican party only works for its constituency class, the rich, and not the whole country. It would seem that what seems best to Republican supporters and politicians is precisely what they envisioned as being core values to the Republican Party but at this time this attitude is not best for the United States. It is all about timing and the republican agenda stops this country’s forward recovery in its tracks. We are running out of time. We need to take our foot off the brake and apply the gas through job creation, tax the wealthy and allow the deficit to increase. The middle class and lower class suffer from Republican ideology issues which may be unsuited for this moment of time. We need both parties to work together with one aim in mind and that is work for what gets the best results for ALL Americans.


Opinion, Politics
The economic three leg stool
Koch Brothers Allegidly Conducting Class Warfare

Koch Brothers Allegidly Conducting Class Warfare

06/28/2011 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

The Koch brothers own Koch Industries whose annual revenues are estimated to be a hundred billion dollars. The brothers believe in libertarian policies which in itself promotes corporate business freedoms that thus allow unbridled advantage for business and little to none for workers. They have created organizations, American for Prosperity Foundation and Freedom Works to mention a few, to move forward their political agenda. They are very smart and wealthy at using media to mold public opinion. Also, try to make mental note of personal gain issues with these guys. They do not seem to be working for what is best for this nation but rather self interests.

 

_____________

Note: Two “Supreme Court” justices attended one of Koch Brother’s events:
Antonin Scalia
Clarence Thomas


Opinion, Politics
Koch brothers
The Very Rich and the Tax Code

The Very Rich and the Tax Code

06/28/2011 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

The following movie was provided by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center:

Explainer: The Very Rich and the Tax Code from Urban Institute on Vimeo.

Roberton Williams, Senior Fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center


Opinion, Politics
The rich and the tax code
Sand Box Fee

Sand Box Fee

06/23/2011 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

Attempting to resolve the Republican, Libertarian and Democratic Party differences, I propose imposing a sandbox fee separate from the concept of taxes.

The sandbox theory can best be described like this.  Anyone who plays in the sandbox and gains from that play needs to pay a portion of their gains to the owners of the sandbox.   You can also think of this as the house cut or take from winnings.

The nation is a sovereign entity and we all own this country.  We all own the sand box.  We all play in the sand box.  The sand gets moved around as part of the play.  If you enjoy your time playing in the sand box and make something out of the sand, you need to share some of the sand profits with all of us.

I propose a rich person’s fee or wealth fee.  The more you profit over a certain amount, lets say one hundred thousand a year, you pay the rest of us in the form of better social programs such as  education, health care, social security, etc.  This money can ONLY go for programs that serve people directly to make their lives better. Military, fire, police, infrastructure, programs would not qualify.


Opinion, Politics
Sand Box Fee
Why Stop The Recovery?

Why Stop The Recovery?

06/23/2011 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

Now why would a political party not help YOU out but will help large corporations and the rich?  Let us look at  who they represent because they might not be representing YOU.  But they are representing a constituency.  Who could that be?

First let us expose some financial terms.

HNWI stands for “High Net Worth Individual” and one must have 1 million in net worth to meet this requirement.

Ultra-HNMI are those individuals that have a net worth of 30 million or more.

HNWI stands for a small select group of people across the world and especially the United States that have collected wealth to an astonishing degree.

How much wealth is this in total?
(Following figures are world wide totals)
33.4 trillion in 2005
37.2 trillion in 2006
40.7 trillion in 2007
32.8 trillion in 2008
39 trillion in 2009

How many HNWI’s are there in the United States?
2.9 million.  This is equal to 53.5% of the all the HNWIs in the world.

Using the US Debt Clock.org, the US debt is around 14 trillion.  (This figure constantly changes.)

If we take 53.5% of the total world wealth which should equal the US ultra rich share, they poses 20 trillion or more than enough to totally pay off the whole national debt and have a pile of cash left over.

Why stop the recovery?  The rich typically have their wealth in the stock market while the middle class has their wealth in their homes.  The financial institutions got their recovery because of their institutional clout and incestuous relations with the federal government and the necessity to offer liquidity to the market place.   That action benefited the rich because the stock market recovered.  The federal actions thus serves the rich and powerful first.  The second installment never cleared the gate because YOUR power is diffuse and more importantly the rich and corporations do not want to fund YOUR recovery, thus adding to the deficit.  But, as you can see above, the rich can most easily pay for the deficit.  The Republican Party allegedly represents the rich and they do not want their rich constituents taxes raised.  The rich have allegedly taken control of the Republican Party and are using that party to game the system against YOU.


Opinion, Politics
Why stop U.S. Economic Recovery

Posts navigation

OLDER POSTS
NEWER POSTS

Categories

Archives

© 2026   DEMOCRACY 4 ALL