Skip to content
McLarenblog

McLarenblog

Evaluate products and politics for you.

Political Donors Win Lottery?

Political Donors Win Lottery?

01/25/2009 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

The top list of money donors to Obama’s campaign includes a number of top universities.  Here is the list (from  opensecrets.org) in order of amount donated:

Top, first donor:  University of California:  $1,123,898
5th donor:  Harvard University:   $779,460
9th donor:  Stanford University:  $448,184
15th donor:  Columbia University:  $502,866
19th donor:  University of Chicago:  $456,209

The OpenSecrets web site prints this explanation:  “The organizations themselves did not donate, rather the money came from the organization’s PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals’ immediate families.”

The total donation from these top university contributors amounts to  3,310,617.
In the Los Angeles Times (Sunday January 25, 2009, A15) it was reported (Boehner [R]) “cited plans to pump 6 billion into wealthy colleges and universities …”

Sounds like the political process might be another type of lottery.  The universities pay a bit over 3 million and get paid back over 6 billion.  With two candidates running for office, I would say the odds are 50 / 50; pretty good odds.

That’s pretty smart.  Become a really bid donor to a successful president candidacy and you can reap a stupendous reward.  Oh, I almost forgot.  We, the tax payer, actually pay this huge amount.  Oh I almost forgot.  They explain that this pay out is part of a stimulus package.  Still sounds like the lottery to me.


Politics
Columbia University, Harvard University, Obama, OpenSecrets.org, President Obama, Stanford University, University of California, University of Chicago
Book Review: Marching Toward Hell by Michael Scheuer

Book Review: Marching Toward Hell by Michael Scheuer

01/12/2009 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

Book Review: Marching Toward Hell
Author: Michael Scheurer

Analysis:

The book is all about the history of USA  war with radical Muslim warriors.

Patriotic to the core and is the author’s supreme measure for all things.
Brutal exploration of the subject giving no respect to anyone in and out of power.
Honest intent which is well delivered.
Insightful in a host of ways especially the author’s analysis of our problems fighting this war.
Compelling read because as one turns each page the reader might get the sense that it is now our tern to take action as things have gotten so bad.
Whining tone at times through the repeating over and over of the deficiencies of our political leadership.
Panders only to Reagan followers and seems to embrace a Republican view.
Simplistic at times.  The author presents a black and white analysis which most intelligent people will mark down because as we know complexity marks more intellectual skill and our current environments are complex.  Problem is, the subject is war and some times there are black and white issues and solutions.

This book comes to us in an outline form of writing spotted on occasionally with brief aside stories to support the bullet points the author is covering at that moment.  As the historical outline progresses, we are told about the incorrect decisions made by our political leaders.  Each foible our leaders make is explained to us as how it is an error with facts about Islam.  The author educates the reader about the sensitivities of the Muslim people and how these sensitivities have been violated over and over.  The author, toward the end of the book,  moves over to the side of the enemy telling us about ourselves from their point of view, a most clever approach.  The author, all the time, is giving the enemy very high scores for their actions and very low scores for our politicians and our military and for this he is brutal.

Have you ever been in a meeting where some manager is given a small bit of incorrect information in a report and thus dismisses the whole report?  I am thus concerned that if I put to you any perceived deficiencies, I see for this book, that you might condemn the book in total.  I, therefore, recommend this book as  being most important for all people in the United States to read.  But, to be honest, I did detect a few things that bothered me about his book.

One. The author just might have missed a much larger story, the dark side factors that are at play in American politics.  The author comes up with the following reasons, stupidity, historical ignorance and moral cowardliness as reasons why American policy has not met the challenge but has been a failure.  This might be true but could not there be another possibility?  Not to consider this is not surprising as the CIA could not detect moles in its organization for decades.  The author does a wonderful job of taking intelligence and turning it back upon us with the author’s analysis which serves us greatly.  This is what he was trained to do and now does it for us.  He seems incapable at going behind the elite politicians to see what scripts they were being handed and by who(m).  I hope another book covers this aspect because its telling just might reveal treason of the highest order and what a great read that would be.

Two.  The author does cover one more immense problem for the USA, the huge and mounting budget deficit.  Because this is toward the end of the book, and because it is wrapped into a seemingly larger issue of war, it takes a back seat.  Too bad because the deficit is so compelling and more upon us  that it may rival the war with Islam.

Three.   The writing style is most strident in its telling and for the sensitivities of many Americans, this book just might strike some as being way off base because it is an unhappy book and reads harsh, almost raspy.  This is a serious man’s and women’s  book, not for the pink dress and latte crowd which might diminish sales.

I recommend that the author read Elite Deviance as he just might get the message that there is a dark hand behind our politicians decisions which is the reason for us loosing this war.

We recommend this book.


Book Reviews, Reviews
CIA, Elite Deviance, Marching Toward Hell
Wine Recommendation – Inheritance 2006 Petite Sirah

Wine Recommendation – Inheritance 2006 Petite Sirah

01/10/2009 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

We tend to buy wine at Trader Joe’s.  We now make it a practice to ask one of the knowledgeable clerks what wine must we take home, their top pick.  January 10th we visited the Brea, California store and asked this question.  The clerk told us that his pick was Inheritance, a Petite Sirah.  The year was 2006 and was selling one penny shy of twelve dollars.  We had this wine while watching the football payoffs.  The host of the party was taken back by how special this wine tasted.  We score this wine over 90, probably 93.

Wine label for Inheritance 2006 Petite Sirah.
Wine label for Inheritance 2006 Petite Sirah.

An outrageous review at wine library tv web site, Episode #523 covers this wine.  This wine is the third bottle reviewed, can be found here: http://tv.winelibrary.com/2008/08/20/a-tasting-of-value-petite-sirah-episode-523/?cp=11


Wine
Inheritance 2006 Petite Sirah, Trader Joe's
CSU Chancellor’s Memo 1-9-09 And Comments.

CSU Chancellor’s Memo 1-9-09 And Comments.

01/09/2009 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

Charles B. Reed, Chancellor for the California State University system sent out a memo, 1-9-09, titled “Cost Saving Measures and Budget Update”.    The e-mail reminds the reader of the simply awful financial situation the people of California face which has impacted the CSU system.  The Chancellor describes the cost cutting efforts of his office:

  • Travel restrictions for employees.
  • Cancellation of all non-critical equipment and supply purchases
  • Hiring freeze on all positions except those essential to the operation of the university.
  • Salary freeze for all vice president level positions and above including presidents’ and vice chancellors’ salaries and my salary, effective immediately through the 2009-10 budget year.
  • Suspend and shut down state-funded design and construction projects on all of our campuses.

Analysis:
#1.  Staff that have been run through this course before know that there are exceptions to all of the bullet points listed above.  How serious the CSU system “sees” this problem will be shown by how many exceptions will be allowed.

#2.  The Chancellor’s e-mail ends with this statemet: “I encourage our students, faculty, staff, alumni, and labor unions to work together to tell our elected officials as well as our local business, community and civic leaders, that the CSU is the economic powerhouse that provides the highly skilled professionals to the industries that make California successful, and that higher education is a long-term investment that benefits everyone.”     We recommend that the Chancellor does get what he wishes if that is possible.  Cutting back education for a short interval might be a part of a short term aid to this budget crisis.  But, there is a perception that this recession is so dire, that it is expected to last a very long time.  We recommend that the CSU system pay for any special exception by improving its operation by conforming to these system changes:

Find ways to make the CSU system more efficient, fewer managers,  transparent operations, and offer parent advisory committee, in its operations.  In addition some more recommendations:

  • Delete all academic deans from the CSU system, allowing the removal of this unnecessary layer of “management”.
  • Down size all vice president positions to two per campus, one academic, other facility operations.
  • Require exit interviews and find a way for these interviews to be used to root out under performing administrators.
  • Require ombudsmen for each campus over a set number of students and give this person some clout to investigate complaints and follow up with appropriate action to achieve a solution.  The Ombudsmen’s jurisdiction must cover faculty, staff and low level administrators.

College & University, Education
California State University, CSU Chancellor
2008 – Family and Friends Holiday Shopping Errors and Problems

2008 – Family and Friends Holiday Shopping Errors and Problems

01/05/2009 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

(Previously posted on News page)

This is a personalized accounting of holiday purchases that did not go so well.  As time goes on and our family and friends encounter any shopping problems, they will be posted here.

  • 11/29/08: Daughter purchased a World of Warcraft Game Card at Target.  The game card pays for 60 days of WOW playing on the Internet, a subscription fee, and sells for $29.99.  The package was sealed properly but when she opened it up – no game card – empty!  We went back to Target to the returns desk and they told us to get another box.  We did but as soon as my daughter picked up the package she noticed the side had been cut.  We took the package back to the return desk and they apologized and this time a store security guard went with us to the shelf and the last package was also had a slit along the side and the card removed.  The guard apologized profusely and told us that this is a problem for the store.  He said they have security cameras that cover all shelving and he will go back into the recorded footage for that shelf and see who stole the cards.  Target had three box contents stolen that day. They did not have any more game card boxes so they gave us our money back.
  • 11/29/08: We love Borders Book Store.  I did not have my discount coupon with me when I was shopping this day, so I showed my cell phone with the e-mail from Borders giving me a 25% discount.  I had checked with a clerk working the help desk before and she said they allow this procedure all the time because customers claim their printers at home do not work for printing out the discount coupon.  The clerk, at check out, confirmed saying that would work but when I got home I noticed that I was not given the discount on a $29.95 book.  I lost $7.49.

Reviews
Borders Book Store, Target, World of Warcraft, WOW
President Johnson and President Elect Obama

President Johnson and President Elect Obama

01/05/2009 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

January 4th CSPAN ran an interview of a author by the name of Robert Caro.  (http://www.robertcaro.com/ )  Mr. Caro described how he was reading the correspondence of former President Linden Johnson when he was a junior senator as part of his research.  The notes read deferential toward any congressional committee chairman that Johnson needed to deal with.   Then, all of a sudden, the tone of the correspondence changed.  Instead of Johnson asking a certain senator for a moment of this and that person’s time, the tables seemed to turn and they were asking for Johnson’s time.  The implication was clear.   Johnson suddenly attained a great deal of power in a very short time span.

The author knew of a very powerful person in Washington who seemed to know how the place worked and was well connected to the Washington power process.  The author asked this person what took place that gave Johnson this sudden power.  He was told “money” and there would be no record of it being the root of this power.  The author then happened to come across a tally sheet written by Johnson, supposedly showing how Johnson doled out the money he was receiving, apparent proof that Johnson was the keeper of some treasury.

Mr. Caro made, he believes,  a connection to the money Johnson received.  It came from a company now called Halliburton.  The author also stated that the group of oil men who were trying to influence the government were reactionary and were against the new deal.

President Elect Obama just might have received a vast amount of money from sources outside of the “normal” power broker elite system which Johnson allegedly was participating in. We are not sure but it appears that Obama’s campaign contributions came from a pretty broad range of contributors.  NPR reported that President Elect Obama received funds that were more than the Democratic and Republican parties received during the past election process put together!  NPR referred to Obama’s campaign as so financially successful that it could become a third party.  It is quite possible the bulk of this campaign contributions did not come from the oil men.  If this is the case, then powerful business might see their special business interests diminish in Washington.  If that is true, this could be the first time in our history that the whole electorate  now rule and those powerful interests, like Halliburton, find themselves on the outside in comparison.  Those oil people will not quietly accept this as a new norm.  Those guys are a tough crowd.  The question is this.  What tactic will they employ to get back into the seat of power again?


Opinion, Politics
Halliburton, President Elect Obama, President Johnson, Robert Caro, Texas oil men

Posts navigation

OLDER POSTS
NEWER POSTS

Categories

Archives

© 2026   DEMOCRACY 4 ALL