Skip to content
McLarenblog

McLarenblog

Evaluate products and politics for you.

Social Darwinism

Social Darwinism

07/14/2011 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

All men are created equal and it follows that all women are created equal.  The United States Constitution states this and one would hope most of us believe it.  Almost opposite to everyone being equal is the concept and practice of discrimination.  Discrimination typically holds a belief that one or more groups is/are superior to another.  It is used by those who discriminate for a personal gain or out of stupidity and/or phony self glorification.  Discrimination is a selfish endeavor.

Darwin seems to have mixed this up a bit in our society values by describing that the strong will survive and the weak will not.  In other words he created from science the concept that maybe all humans are not equal.   Thus, when Darwin is applied to politics it gets messy and dangerous.  All men are created equal is sometimes a religious, a political, and legal ideal.   In our country we hopefully evolved (pun intended) to believe in our laws and political system that all people are equal as an ideal.  But how does the politically dark side of Darwin, that some people are disadvantaged, either innately or by design factor into political thinking?

Here is where Darwinism goes gray rather than black and white.  There is a reality that some individuals can not or decide not to excel.  The reasons may be due to mental or physical deficiencies or a temporary problem.  It might be due to really bad decision making.  It may be due to home and rearing problems and/or family hardships.  It may be due to substance abuse.  It may be due to any number of the prior factors or other factors that we do not yet recognize.  The analysis problem arises when political beliefs include the social Darwin viewpoint is inserted at the wrong moments and points of arguments.  We do need to recognize individuals are disadvantaged for reasons of offering programs to help them.  It becomes dangerous when political attitudes and political promotions, are reasoned to exclude those individuals because they currently have problems.  For example, some political views hold that there should be minimal state power.  Connecting the dots, what follows from that, calls for less social programs to help the disadvantaged.  A form of social Darwinism is used to rationalize out helping segments of our population so those who are not in that disadvantaged group gain.  Is this not a slightly obscure form of discrimination which also goes against the Constitution?


Opinion, Politics
Social Darwinism
Unable To Connect The Dots.

Unable To Connect The Dots.

07/14/2011 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

One portion of the United States electorate seems incapable or not willing to take the time to connect the dots and thus render a good intelligent political decision when supporting political candidates and legislation.  By this we mean the process of collecting various bits of information and making sense from it not as a singular item of information but as a collection of related items that may reveal a further “truth” seems to be lost on a lot of individuals.

Connecting the dots is a multi stage process.  The first stage is to do what anthropologists do and that is to codify or break down a problem in its component parts so the part that you identify makes sense.  For example if we were to examine global warming, we would try to find some indicators of snow pack fall, changes in precipitation, changes in heat or coolness, etc.  The next stage is to look backward in time and come up with a measure for a single item to track changes.  We then need to jump to now or look at a progression of data points from the past to the present.  Next we need to look for trends.  This is where charts can really come in handy.  Weather is somewhat easy to quantify and chart but very difficult to predict without sophisticated computers.  We can predict some times short term weather without a super computer.  What about a social movement or progression?   For example, how would we measure whether we need another stimulus to the economy?  We could do some research and try to find some pertinent economic factors that show how healthy or sick an economy is.  We need to know where we have been, where we are now and then make some pretty honest predictions as to what will happen if we do this or that.  A shortcut for most of us is to just read the newspaper and watch the news and pay particular attention to trends.  The daily news should show us where we are now.  A simple method for determining where we may be in the future is look toward experts.  There are a lot of authorities that make it their business to make good honest predictions but there is even more individuals and think tanks that want to influence what you believe and spin lies and false data.  Connecting the dots is a bit of a mine field for all of us.  For a lot of the electorate, they just don’t try but cling to this or that spot of information that seems to hold importance and thus their vote is somewhat flawed.


Opinion, Politics
Unable to connect the dots
AT&T U-verse Problem #2

AT&T U-verse Problem #2

07/13/2011 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

Our family seriously contemplated trying out AT&T U-verse system because Time Warner Cable in Southern California has some serious issues.  A sales man came to our door selling U-verse systems.  I decided to sign up even though I seldom buy from anyone who walks door to door.  The sales man changed his prices at least five times during our conversation.  I should have tossed they guy out but he had just started working for his company, New Image Marketing, a few weeks ago.  He was young and it was obvious he was feeling his way with this sale.  After I signed the contract and he left, I had a discussion with my son and wife.  My son suggested I dump the company because we found out that the highest Internet speed was not on special, would cost a lot more.  My conversation with my wife revealed that she heard that the installation cost would be free, the contract showed it being free but it also showed a “Service Activation Fee” of $36 which was not talked about.   Each day, I was getting more concerned that I did not know the complete charges that were in the contract.  I decided to go to a local AT&T store and have someone review the contract.  At the store, a young lady helped me out and told me that the store could offer a much better deal.  Instead of a six month discount of $43 off the contract she could do it for one year.  I asked her to cancel the contract and I would sign up with the store offer.  She went on the phone for over one hour and was hung up on once by a corporate support person.    I was in the store for close to two hours watching her working the phone to cancel my order.  She could not get it done!  She gave me her personal phone number and asked me to call her the next day.  I did call her the next day and she said that she can not cancel the order.  She said she would not give up and to call her the next day.  My wife told me to call an 800 number revealed in an e-mail we received from AT&T confirming our order.  I called the 800 number and tried to cancel the order but got a run around with absolutely no accurate information about the order status.  I went on the Internet and looked up my order and it said “Pending”.  To shorten this story up a lot, I will tell you that there was no way to stop the installation.

The installer showed up and he was just as nice and accommodating as the store employee.  He tried to install the U-verse system but we were too far from the main fiber optic box so our Internet speed did not meet the contract requirements.  I told the installer that I did not want the installation at the vastly inferior Internet speed.  Now I watched this wonderful guy make call after call and waiting long periods of time to get the order canceled.  His time was vastly wasted in this simple effort.

My experience with AT&T front line personnel, store sales and installer was spectacular. They were darn near perfect and did a wonderful job of raising the reputation for the company.

Let me list the apparent deficiencies if not alleged incompetence of the AT&T U-verse system management:

  • There is no dedicated phone lines for store sales persons to transact customer business.  I find it incredible that store employees must use the same phone numbers as ordinary customers.  Store employees need to be efficient for the customers and to generate personal commission sales.  For them to scale down their commissions due to corporate alleged corporate mis management is most revealing of a monopoly utility mind set.
  • There is no dedicated phone lines for AT&T installers.  They must call the same phones as ordinary customers.  You have an installer who spends three hours at a customer location and then needs to cancel or process an order.  He has to wait long periods of time?  His overhead is huge.  He drives a well stocked expensive truck, is paid a decent wage and needs to service as many customers as possible during his shift.  He needs to be made more productive so the company assets he embodies can more quickly move along to service more customers.
  • It is simply appalling that AT&T can not reveal on their Internet sites that any particular customer address is able to achieve a particular Internet and TV quality signal.   We have been told that the line men and women who are responsible for the signal lines have the maps as to node distances.  The store employee and the AT&T U-verse web site should offer any person the ability to enter an address and view the full range of Internet speeds prior to any contract being signed.

In summary, AT&T management seem to be willing to waste employees time resulting in driving up company costs.  These added costs trickle down to the us, the customer, and nothing can be done about this waste because AT&T is a monopoly that is not properly regulated by intelligent business decision making or the government.

 

Update:  Almost precisely one month after putting up these posts we lost our land line phone.  It seems an AT&T person  pulled our feed wire at the change over box.  It took three days to get someone out to fix it.  The repair technician told me that it looked like someone thought it was an unused wire.  I asked the repair technician if this might be malicious, due to the blog articles, and he replied that it cost the company a lot of money to send him out to do the repair.


Opinion, Technology
AT&T U-Verse Problem
AT&T U-verse Problem #1

AT&T U-verse Problem #1

07/13/2011 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

AT&T embarked upon changing out vast areas of their network with a new fiber optic send system to improve upon their aging twisted wire technology called POTS (plain old telephone system) starting about 2007.  The company provided fiber optic hub boxes out from their old block house switch barns and called it U-verse.  The fiber optics trees out from the old switch building into committees called fiber to the neighborhood (FTTN) so as to push forward a much better technology.  They were loosing customers with their old system and needed to instill a significant upgrade.  The theory being that fiber optics offers low signal loss, zero cross talk and huge bandwidth, ideal choice for a robust modern technology improvement.  Problem is they could not afford to provide fiber all the way to your house and business, a huge and vastly expensive undertaking for buried community utilities and also expensive for pole/aerial delivery.  Verizon tried that by putting fiber optics on top of the old twisted wire systems that used poles but had to charge huge amounts of money, like $80 a month for Internet.   That system could not be sustained because the customer was not willing to pay the high cost.  The AT&T method is quite literally, in many ways, short of the Verizon system.  AT&T put fiber out to the street somewhere, hopefully close to your home and business, and then switched over to the old existing copper twisted pair for the final run into your home.   This system is called Fiber To The Cabinet (FTTCab) or fiber to the node (FTTN).  You can spot these devices because the show themselves as two metal cabinets side by side on a side walk close to your home.  One is the fiber box and the one next to it is the POTS box.  They are tied together with an underground U shaped pipe.  This is not ideal for a number of reasons.  First, the last and final leg of the signal delivery is the old twisted copper pair connections or POTS.  These connections had to be renewed by sub contractors because the old system connections were not that reliable.  You might have seen crews of workers opening the old twisted wire boxes and reconnecting the wires.  Second, the twisted pair wire is not as capable as the cable company coax for making a good high quality run into your home.  Cable companies add amplifiers along their coax lines to boost signal strength and maintain bandwidth.  At this moment, AT&T is not adding twisted pair amplifiers into their lines but rely on the closeness of the fiber to cooper change over locations FTTN.  Another issue is that the old existing cooper wire system uses large multiple strand cables that go from box to box in the ground or from pole to pole from which they string out each customer’s signal.  Each box is called a node.  Your home or business can be down from the FTTCab a large number of node connections which imparts added points of electronic resistance loss.

Another problem inherent in the final leg of signal delivery is all the advantages of fiber disappear.  Cross talk, line resistance and decreased bandwidth are significant factors.  The bandwidth problem is handled with a special technology called DSL.  DSL uses much higher send frequencies for digital signals and filters to separate out the high  frequency digital signals from  voice  signals.  In the home you will see two wall connections.  One will be for DSL and the second PHONE.  With the U-verse system you will see a CAT connection labeled U-verse and the other will be for your phone.  The prior DSL system had been replaced with ADSL2+ and VDSL or very high bitrate digital subscriber line.  Both system offers very good up and down digital speeds but the benefits degrade with distance from the fiber change over to POTS wiring.

Another problem for AT&T is the final installation in home or business requires an installation technician to come out, rewire existing connections and test the line.  It is true that cable companies may need to come out to some customers, but that is an option.  The point here is that with cable TV, there is an option for a technician to come out but with U-verse an installation technician is REQUIRED.

AT&T has, at this writing, five levels of Internet service from 24 Mbit/s down to 3 Mbit/s.  If you go into any of their stores you can order any speed you want if you are willing to pay for it, up to 24 Mbit/s bits per second  down speed and up to 3 Mbit/s bits up speed.  Problem is, you must have your house within 1000 feet of the change over box to get the maximum speed.  Our home was 2,900 feet from the box and thus we could only attain Elite service which was second from the bottom.  The installer told us we could only get 12 Mega bit speed down due to our distance from the change over box.  We understand, also, that our TV signal may be affected with a loss of pixels on the screen.

Standing back from this AT&T system and compare it with the cable company, one can see that the cable company has a huge advantage over the AT&T U-verse system for homes that are past a certain distance from the change over box.  Our cable company offers 20 Mega bits down speed and 1Mega bit up speed for ALL homes within their system.  The AT&T offers a variable delivery.  They can NOT offer top level service like the cable companies can to all their customers.

Reference:

  • VDSL technology Issues – An Overview:    http://www.analog.com/library/analogdialogue/archives/34-05/vdsl/index.html
  • For an under the hood look at fiber optic to cooper implementation: http://wn.com/fiber_to_the_node

Opinion, Technology
AT&T U-Verse Problem
Unemployment Still Goes Up

Unemployment Still Goes Up

07/09/2011 Score Card Comments 0 Comment
Unemployment Rate Graph
This graph attempts to show the total number of people wanting jobs.

The following graph was obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Not In Labor Force, Want A Job Now”.  The newspapers July 10th, 2011 reported a significant increase in the unemployment rate.  The graph shown below attempts to show the rather fast increase starting in 2008.  We marked the bottom points from 2008 and up to Jan 2010.  One can see that in the beginning of 2010 the incline started to decrease slightly but still shows significant increase overall.  We marked the top and bottom of the 2010 up to now range to show the possible next results, or what one might expect the next data point to fall within.

Information obtained from: http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet


Opinion, Politics
U.S. unemployment goes up.
The Libertarian Philosoply

The Libertarian Philosoply

07/07/2011 Score Card Comments 0 Comment

When one  takes an overall top down view of Libertarian philosophy and the Libertarian Party one might immediately think that this philosophy should work best during the birth and expansion periods of this country when individual personal action, individual power, individual initiative were of paramount importance in a challenging environment of the times.  Individuals and families needed to rely on themselves more and society less for survival.  I think of farmer families spotted across this country working diligently as sole economic units and only minimally dependent upon neighbors and limited government for aid.

  • Libertarian Philosophy:
  • Maximize individual liberty
  • Freedom of expression
  • Freedom of action
  • Minimization of the state and state organizations.
  • Minimal public assistance.
  • Minimal support of the poor.

A number of factors have created themselves into our social and economic fabric through time and history and partially as a result of our tremendous economic and social success that make the Liberation philosophy inappropriate if not down right illogical today.  Let us list some of those factors and you should see how society has so vastly changed from simple to complex that the Libertarian view has not kept up with this complexity.

In our early US history, business interests needed cheap labor.  Today we move our factories over to foreign countries because there is where the cheap labor is and transportation is so efficient at bringing product back toward our county after it is created overseas.  But the first, early nation, “solution” for cheap labor was inverse to what we view as the solution for today, that is, to import the labor into this county in the form of African slaves.  This was a social problem at inception and has caused horrendous inequities among a large segment of our population.

Another historical bump in the road for Libertarians is the take over of Indian tribes, leaving a population of indigenous peoples robbed of their sovereign lands and power.
The next significant historical factor that marks the Libertarian views as obsolete is the illegal migration into this county.  We have currently over 8 to 12 million (possibly 20 to 30 million) illegal individuals from foreign countries living here.  I will not argue the right or wrong for this situation but it exists as a social problem that we must face.  This “illegals” problem really tests the Libertarian concept of public assistance.

The next significant historical evolution that marks our society as too complex for Libertarians to accept is the vast number of society members that have not risen to being complete fully functional individuals for any number of reasons.  This category alone requires a partial list of  sub-components and let me list some of those here, in no particular order or level of importance:

  • Children
  • Elderly
  • Sick
  • Infirm
  • Dementia
  • Substance abusers
  • Criminals

The reason Libertarian Party and beliefs still exists is due to the fact that the tenants of this philosophy work for the betterment of the rich and business.    The rich do not want to spend “their” money for social programs that help anyone other than themselves.  Businesses do not want controls put upon them for worker rights, environment and business practices.  Businesses and the rich do not want to be taxed, plain and simple.  Intellectually this Libertarian philosophy is flawed because it serves only those who believe in its tenants.  It fails the smell test because it is rotten for the rest of us.   For these times it is embarrassingly out of date and should be closed and put in the history books as a once upon a time theory that wrinkled like a prune with age.


Opinion, Politics
Libertarian philosophy

Posts navigation

OLDER POSTS
NEWER POSTS

Categories

Archives

© 2026   DEMOCRACY 4 ALL